Partner-specific skills
Laumann and peers (1994) articulated a rational alternatives outlook on sexuality that views individual erectile choices as diverse, such that it takes some time to master just how to you need to a partner, creating erectile proficiency partner-specific in place of completely lightweight. The two argue that investing in learning how to happiness some companion is definitely logical. Someone might inquire whether mastering an innovative new partner’s sexual needs qualifies as tedious adequate to get thought expense, which implies a price now for a later achieve. Having said that, Laumann and peers mention that finding a new mate try high priced, which makes it staying with somebody and teaching themselves to remember to that mate logical. As Waite and Joyner (2001b:248) notice, “sex employing 
the mate who knows precisely what a person likes and how to give it’s sure to be more pleasing than sex with a partner which does not have this type of capabilities.” If strategic investment must discover how to satisfy a person, we will be expecting women’s orgasm to keep reduced across all hookups—even repeating hookups—because it’s possible to suppose financial are motivated by persistence.